Yes! Wind Power for Cohocton

Monday, July 31, 2006

WIND TURBINES


For centuries, humans have harnessed the wind to power a variety of machines, from flour milling equipment to water pumps. With increasing concern for environmental issues, fluctuating oil and gas prices and improved technology, wind-driven electric generators, called wind turbines, are becoming common throughout the world. Most US installations are found in California, but utilities in many Midwestern and Eastern states are now building or operating wind turbines.

Cheaper to construct than conventional power plants, wind power has huge potential. By late 1999, the work capacity of wind-generated electricity was already 9,600 megawatts-enough to power 3.5 million typical suburban American homes! Some experts feel many states have sufficient wind resources to provide electrical power far above current usage levels; some feel it could someday provide electricity for the entire country.

While various designs exist, the horizontal axis style is increasingly common. These units consist of a large diameter rotor, a drive shaft connected to a gear box, and a generator. Except for the rotor, all of this equipment is housed in a streamlined nacelle. While it looks fragile, the entire unit weighs in at about 45,000 pounds in working order. The nacelle assembly rests on a 360 degree pivot, mounted at the top of a tall steel tower. This insures it is always exposed to the prevailing winds. Various support equipment cables and interconnections to the electrical distribution system are found at ground level.

Finding the proper site greatly enhances turbine performance, but there are many factors that impact the design. An evaluation of the available wind resources, measured in watts per square meter, indicates how much wind power is available (test towers). Wind speeds seldom remain steady and are affected by terrain, presence of large natural or man-made obstructions (trees or tall buildings for example) time of day and season. Speeds also vary at different heights above ground level. In general an average annual wind speed of 11mph (5 m/s) is required for a turbine to be effective, while speeds of 13mph (6 m/s) are needed for larger “wind farms”.

Since the turbine depends on wind speed for energy, its electrical output changes as the speed of the wind through the rotor increases or decreases. At moderate speeds, power output is greatly determined by the shape and geometry of the rotor blades. Each blade is airfoil shaped so air passes faster over the longer (upper) side, creating a lower air pressure area above the blade. This difference in pressure on the surface creates aerodynamic lift, the same force that causes airplanes to take off. But since the rotor is fixed to a hub, the lifting force causes rotation. At the same time, an opposite reaction creates drag force impeding the movement of the rotor. Designers must create a rotor blade with a high lift-to-drag ratio (adjustable along the blade’s length) so the generator always runs efficiently despite changes in wind speed. Rotor diameter, also called “sweep” or “capture,” is also critical for efficient operation. Designers must find the correct length to produce peak energy levels consistently from the wind at the site. The turbine is built to start producing electricity when the winds reach a certain level, known as the cut-in speed. To protect the turbine, a cut-out speed is also determined, which stops the rotor if wind speeds are too high. Many systems now incorporate adjustable pitch blades which improve performance, limit peak electrical output more efficiently and reduce the load on the drive train. The blades themselves are lightweight and are typically constructed of glass fiber reinforced epoxy. Since the blades rise above the tower and the turbine is often the tallest structure for miles, it makes an easy target for lightning. The rotors are equipped with receptors and conductors to discharge the bolt safely, along with lightning arrestors, deep earth grounding and shielding on the entire unit. Once in place, blades require minimal maintenance, with service lives of 20 years or more.

The support tower is also a critical part of the completed turbine. It must clear any ground obstacles and reach the desired elevation where efficient wind speeds are available. Built tough to support the weight of the unit above, they are made of tubular steel and assembled in sections. An internal safety ladder allows easy access to the nacelles in any kind of weather.

A microprocessor controls all of the turbine functions and interfaces with a remote panel, allowing for remote control, access and troubleshooting if problems arise.

Great improvements have been made in all areas of wind turbine design, including better gearboxes, drive trains and generators, that eliminate many earlier problems while increasing efficiency and lowering costs. These technological advances have also expanded the number of sits in the US where wind power can be put to work producing electricity. Modern wind turbines are extremely reliable and many systems often have an on-line availability of 99% and more.



Yes! Wind Power for Cohocton

THE FARMER’S WIFE

First, I would like to thank each & every member of the boards along with the Town Supervisor of Cohocton. You have tried to plan ahead and look for ways to help Cohocton and its residents. Any industry has pros & cons but they need to be weighed. You have taken a lot of abuse, as has Sandy Riely, while just trying to do your jobs.

Cohocton has an opportunity to go forward as a pioneer in wind producing energy. A small group of people keep talking about the farmers, land owners and/or lease holders who should be good to their neighbors and consider their feelings. WE ARE THE ONES THAT HAVE PAID TAXES ON THE LAND THAT YOU CALL “YOUR VIEW,” that you hold so dear. We have provided the means to your pleasure including land to hunt on, driving ATV’s & four wheelers, horseback riding, etc. Why do your posted signs mean so much more than ours?? You feel is ok to go through the fields (our crops which we need to harvest to pay taxes) without a care. It is just a field who cares! If stopped, “Oh, I didn’t know, is supposed to make it ok. Try that on Mr. Hall’s land! You be sued! Litigation is how he makes his living, so he says!

You expect permission, when you do take the time to ask, to hunt, trap, hike, snowmobile, etc., but say we are mean, selfish and not accepting of you into our community if told no. NOW YOU WANT TO TELL US WE CAN’T HARVEST ANOTHER CROP WHICH COMES AT A CRUCIAL TIME FOR MANY OF OUR LOCAL FARMERS. WE HAVE BEEN MEMBERS OF THIS COMMUNITITY FOR MANY GENERATIONS AND DO NOT MAKE DECISIONS CONCERNING OUR LAND HASTILY OR BECAUSE A FEW $$$ HAVE BEEN OFFERED US.

FARMING IS A WAY OF LIFE, NOT JUST A JOB THAT YOU CHANGE BECAUSE IT ISN’T MAKING YOU ENOUGH MONEY. THE LAND IS IN YOUR BLOOD AND YOU TAKE CARE OF IT.

We pay taxes every year-the 1% of us that are being threatened & harassed pay approximately 10% of the taxes collected in this township-so that you can enjoy the scenery on OUR LAND. We would like to put windmills on our land. What other business has come knocking on our door?? EVERYONE DOES BENEFIT FROM MONEY THAT IS PUT INTO TOWN, COUNTY AND SCHOOL DISTRICTS. Contributing dollars locally is good for all of us. This project isn’t without hassles and traffic during construction, but that also brings $$ to businesses. Remember construction of Rt. 390-can you imagine the congestion if we didn’t have that road now? How about when Rt. 15 was changed at the top of Maple and North Dansville St.-telephone lines have been run, as well as electric lines, IT IS PROGRESS-HELPING TOWARDS THE FUTURE OF OUR GRANDCHILDREN- WITH WIND POWER THERE ISN’T ANY HAZARDOUS WASTE TO TRANSPORT OR STORE ANYWHERE! Let’s be the 1st 5% of the future as the project is developed.

Mr. Hall’s website, featuring the American Flag displayed upside down with the silhouette of a man with some sort of rifle across is offensive, but that is his choice. He built his home like a fortress and then planted many trees purposely blocking a view across a valley that had been visible to his neighbors for many years, and then put a copper topped roof on it-I’M SURE HE DIDN’T ASK TO HAVE HIS BLUEPRINTS VOTED ON BY THE RESIDENTS OF THE TOWN OF COHOCTON. Does it reflect blinding light from the sun? WHO CARES?! It is his right to do what he wants with his land because he owns it and pays taxes-NOT HIS FAIR SHARE AS HE SUED THE TOWN TO GET A SUBSTANTIAL REDUCTION-but he does pay taxes. He is NOT paying the taxes on the land he views from his home.

Let’s all try to support the positives of this project. COHOCTON NEEDS HELP…do we want to generate some $$$ here or wait for the government to say we need clean safe energy and take the necessary measures to put a project in. It could be your land they decide to use, without any setback restrictions.

I’M ASKING THE HEART AND SOUL OF THIS COMMUNITY, COHOCTON, not Naples, Prattsburgh or anywhere else to support the landowners, lease holders and farmer. Let’s look at the positives of this project not the distorted picture that the anti-wind group is trying to show. They even put a DISCLAINER at the bottom of Mr. Strasburg’s questions presented to The Planning Board: stating; ALL THE FACTS WINDWATCH PRINTED MAY NOT BE TRUE. I guess you were supposed to check that out for yourself! Did you read the small print at the end of Mr. Strasburg’s paper?

One last thing, another bus trip is being planned to go to Fenner; please take the time to go and see a Wind Project for yourself. Why Fenner and not Tug Hill? Fenner has a similar placing of wind turbines that will be constructed in Cohocton. The Tug Hill project does not have the same set backs and placement as the Cohocton Wind Project.

Cohocton Wind Watch, bully away-just remember we will all be neighbors no matter what decision is made. Just like the school merger, we may disagree but in the end we all have to live together.


Respectfully,


Pat Drum (farmer’s wife)

BUS TRIP TO FENNER WIND FARM

UPC will be sponsoring a trip to the Fenner Wind Farm

Saturday, August 12, 2006

Reserve your seat by calling the Cohocton Wind Office

585-384-9550

Enjoy a trip to Fenner and see the Wind Turbines

Friday, July 28, 2006

On July 28th The Cohocton Clean Blog was HACKED all content was deleted.
on the same date posts such as the below began appearing on this Blog.
They will be deleted.

This Blog as well as the YesWindCohocton website does not condone this type of behavior. We will in fact work with Jim Lince to assist him in recovering from this Despicable act.

The following is a comment sent to Yes! Wind by an unidentified person posing as Mr. Lince

lince said...
The forum allowed me to identify who the frequent poster George Buss is. Subsequently, I have asked the Cohoctonclean blog to remove all exchanges between Mr. Buss. In light of this, I respectfully ask you to do the same.
Thank you.
Jim LinceCohocton, NY
1:02 PM


You will notice areas that say post removed by a Blog Administrtor this is in no way an attempt to censor this Blog, these were removed at the request of Jim Lince who's name was used by another. They were not his comments, they were posted by a person posing as Mr. Lince.

We offer our apologies for any inconvenience or stress this may have caused, we will be looking at measures to prevent this in the future.

Thank you for your understanding.




Thursday, July 27, 2006

The Evening Tribune
News

Thursday, July 27, 2006
YesWind offers proof of benefits: Cohocton forum shows how towns can reap funds if turbines are erected
By MICHELLE KING - STAFF WRITERPublished: Thursday, July 27, 2006 11:19 AM CDTE-mail this story Print this page
COHOCTON - A pro-wind forum in Cohocton Wednesday night accentuated the positive.The information session, hosted by YesWind, a local group that supports wind farm development, featured a brief presentation from three town supervisors who have wind farm development as well as three environmentalists. Afterwards, the panel answered questions from those in attendance.Although town supervisors Arleigh Rice, from the Town of Lowville, Norman Roof from Harrisburg in Lewis County, and Russell Cary, of the Town of Fenner, differed in opinion, one thing was certain - they all favored the economic benefits of the project.
“We're a small town of about 423 with no industry,” said Roof. “Our budget is around $300,000 a year and this year we signed an order for three new trucks, one with a plow that came to $450,000 alone. That's what its meant for our community with no extra tax.“Financially, it's had a huge impact on our small town,” he added.Cary said wind farm development was positive for his town, as well.
“It's been a very positive experience financially, but more importantly for the quality of life,” he said. “I can't argue the idea of the visual impact and we've lived with them since Sept. 11, 2001 when we put a flag on the tallest one. I think you have to weigh all of it. It also helps our small family farms.”Later during the question-and-answer portion of the program, Cary was asked by a resident what the economic benefit was in comparison to farming and how much land was lost to the development.“We lost about 165 acres, and gained about $1.7 million,” he said.
“I don't think you'll make that kind of money on a farm,” Rice added.When Brian Smith, Citizens Campaign for the Environment program coordinator spoke, he stressed the importance of conserving energy.“It's something I've worked on for a number of years and I believe wind power is necessary to the environment and our future,” he said. “Energy demand is increasing and the alternative is an increase on fossil fuels. We're in the middle of a global energy crisis. Wind is not the magic pull but is certainly part of the solution.”
Marion Trieste, Alliance for Clean Energy representative, said renewable power currently makes up less than 1 percent of all energy.“Fifty-two percent comes from fossil fuels and 29 percent from nuclear,” she said. “We're just trying to reach Governor Pataki's goal to get to 25 percent by 2013.”The questions asked varied, and included ice throw concerns, to spinning shock, noise, monetary benefits, how many turbines they had constructed, and if a terrorist attack on the turbines is likely.
After the forum, resident Jim Lince remained skeptical, saying his anti-wind energy opinions still remained strong.“Basically a lot of the answer session just skinned the surface,” he said. “They said good things but no data to support what they're talking about, especially with fossil fuels. Not even a coal plant has been closed. They are great slogans but not a lot of data holds up.“For example, Roof was explaining ice throw while talking about baseball,” Lince added. “And the property study she (Trieste) talked about there's not a single property within 4,000 feet, most are 3 to 5 miles away. My question is if money was not involved then would they do still do it. Those types of questions are not being asked.”
A proposed wind farm in Cohocton will be constructed by UPC Wind Partner LLC, and calls for 41 2-megawatt turbines. Each will stand about 403-feet high. The area will encompass more than 5,775 acres. In addition, the construction is slated for spring of 2007, and may be completed as early as October 2007.

THANK YOU

YES! Wind Power for Cohocton would like to thank all who attended their Wind Forum at the Lion’s Pavilion. We appreciate the courtesy shown our guests and those attending the meeting.

We hope this communication will continue with constructive dialogue. Please feel comfortable in contacting the YES! Group with your questions and concerns at:

Yes! Wind Power for Cohocton
Box 164
Cohocton, New York 14826

Email: yeswindpowercohocton@frontiernet.net

www.yeswindcohocton.com

Sunday, July 16, 2006

YOU ARE INVITED
To a Forum on Wind Energy
Wednesday July 26th
Lion's Club Community Pavilion next to the Town Hall
Schedule of Events
  • 6:00 -7:00 meet our special guests, look at our displays, enjoy a hot dog and soda on us!
  • 7:00-8:00 remarks on wind energy by our special guests
  • 15 minute break
  • 8:15-9:30 our panel will answer your questions

SPECIAL NOTE:

due to limited seating we ask that you bring a blanket or chair to sit on, children welcome

This event is sponsored by

YES! WIND POWER FOR COHOCTON

TO THOSE CONCERNED: This blog will no longer post any writings from unidentified person or persons, (hunter, formosa). You must sign your OWN name, not the ID name or the group you represent in order to be posted. You are taking the liberty of sniping against people, using their names but hiding behind a shroud of secrecy in order to protect your identity and empower yourself. This will not be tolerated further. You have your own blog to slander at will and I am sure will continue to do so.

Jane Towner

Friday, July 14, 2006

Mr. Strasburg, I get the impression that you do not have faith in the local Fire Departments. These men and women donate their time to assist us when in need. They risk their lives to help us out and you question their ability to fight fires? As for turbine fires causing a major wildfire. A tree could just as easily get struck by lightening and spark a fire just like what is happening near Pioneertown in CA this week. Last I heard several thousand acres were burned. I think that you are super sizing this issue for some reason. Fires start every day from hundreds of reasons. (Car accidents, Freight Train derailments, Gas leaks, playing with matches, throwing out a cigarette butt etc.) Fire Departments not only train for a multitude of events, but they have what is called mutual aide. This means that if something were to occur on the Hill, on 390, in your neighborhood, or in one of the many plants, businesses around here, the FD can have access to whatever resources needed. Cohocton is never alone in any emergency. I think you should put some faith in our FD as someday you may need them. I guarantee they will be there for you and your family. I support them 100% and am confident they can handle any problem that could arise from the wind turbines.


Alley Heist

James Lince has brought it to our attention, that "formosa" is a group. We ask you, Jim, to identify yourselves as the Yes! group has on your blog site, in order to be able to post on our site.

Saturday, July 08, 2006

This posting, written by Rick Towner, is in response to an email sent to the Yes! Wind Group with a cc to Rick Towner from Dr. Morehouse. Mr. Towner has given permission to the Yes! Group to publish his comments to Dr. Morehouse.

Dear Doc,
Since your cohoctonfree site first came up, and the photo was readily available, I received a lot of inquires as to the size of turbines in Cohocton and the Wolcott farms picture. I believe most of these inquiries were based on public statements from Cohocton Wind Watch that UPC plans to use “off shore” 2.0MW turbines, turbines “that have not been installed anywhere else” and were simply reinforced by the Wolcott photo. Members of YES! Wind Power Cohocton have also been questioned as to turbine size and people have referenced your picture of the Wolcott farm.

As you saw on the YES! Wind Power site your original picture was placed with an actual picture of existing turbines in Fenner. This was done to offset fear that UPC was planning turbines that would need to be over 1100 feet tall to match the scale in the Wolcott Farm photo. When a reporter this week asked me where the Wolcott picture came from and I went to your site. As you say, the picture is not in the same spot as it was originally and I did have to dig for it. When I found it I saw that you had corrected the photo, and I very much appreciate your spending time to fix it. When I discovered the change I sent an email to the webmaster at the YES! Wind Power Cohocton site to note your change on their website.

Please keep watching the YES! Wind Power Cohocton site. In the near future they will be posting photos and movie clips of Fenner, Tug Hill and Wethersfield I took in the last couple weeks and forwarded to them. This Sunday I will be taking a trip to Bear Creek PA (http://www.newwindenergy.com/windfarm_bearcreek/index.html). Bear Creek is now online with twelve 2.0MW Gamesa turbines just like the ones proposed for Cohocton in the DEIS. I will be taking more photos and video in keeping with my personal attempts to bring accurate representations of turbine site and sound by photographing actual sites.

Again I appreciate your time and dedication to correcting the Wolcott Farm picture.
I am sure with the recent passing of Charlie Wolcott on their minds the Wolcott Family will deeply appreciate the misrepresentation of their farm being corrected too.


Rick Towner
Public Outreach
Coordinator

UPC Wind Management, LLC
28 Maple Avenue
Cohocton, NY 14806
Tel: 585.384.9550
Fax: 585.384.5023
Mobile: 585.944.4684
Email: rtowner@upcwind.com
http://www.upcwind.com/

From: Dr. Bill Morehouse [mailto:wmorehouse@hisbranches.org] Sent: Friday, July 07, 2006 9:49 PMTo: webmaster@yeswindcohocton.comCc: Rick TownerSubject: Web site revisions

Dear Friends and Neighbors at Yes! Wind Power,

I've just come across your new website (www.yeswindcohocton.com) and blog and am flattered to find that one of my crudest attempts at graphic simulation is on your Home Page!!! Somebody had to dig deep into our www.cohoctonfree.com website to find that little photo. I appreciate your visit to our website and your legitimate concern about the scale in this picture -- I feel badly that I didn't correct it much sooner. I originally created it (by eyeball using a home photo editing program I have) one evening back when I first set up the site in May and went on to other things, but then a few weeks ago one of my grown sons said "Dad, I think your towers are too tall in the Wolcott farm picture" and Rick Towner said "I hate to nit pick, but..." and I purposed to fix it. I did the math, perspective, and graph work as a fun exercise while I was on vacation last week (computer simulations aren't my usual occupation) and fixed it as best I could when I got back a few days ago (see http://www.cohoctonfree.com/size.htm), but not quite in time to keep it from becoming the "Yes!" poster case for how whacked out the opposition is. Please forgive me for not handling this unintended but serious graphic misrepresentation earlier. I would genuinely like some constructive feedback about other points that I've raised throughout our website. I know that we can each find things that "the other side" has said or done or published or posted that rub us the wrong way, but I think that somehow we need to rise above the level of offense and retaliaton and open some honest dialogue that leads to resolution (which will probably involve at least a measure of compromise) not the drawing up of battle lines and war to the bloody end.

Please change your Home Page to reflect my humble revision and let me know the best way you think we can begin some dialogue. If Cohocton wants the very best outcome I think we need to open our hearts to one another, listen carefully, and allow cool heads to prevail.

God bless you!
(Dr.) Bill Morehouse

(affectionately known as "Doc" by some folks)

Friday, July 07, 2006

US crude hits record high
Friday July 7, 7:17 AM EDT
LONDON (Reuters) - U.S. crude oil futures rose to a fresh record high above $75 a barrel on Friday, boosted by strong demand in top consumer the United States.
By 1109 GMT, U.S. crude had risen as high as $75.42, up 2 cents from the previous record hit this week.
LET'S STOP DEPENDING ON FOREIGN FUEL
THINK GREEN
FEEL THE WIND, THINK CLEAN!!!!

Wednesday, July 05, 2006

WHO ARE WE?


Yes! Wind Power for Cohocton consists of the following upstanding citizens of
the Town of Cohocton.

Gene & Pat Drum, Ron & Jane Towner, Allison & Vince Heist, Hal & Judy Graham, Gerald & Dorothy Moore, Eileen Schneider, John Meyer, Dave Simolo, Chris Coleman, Ron & Linda Moody, Dave & Pat Harrold, Diane Zeh, Wayne Hunt, Mark Densmore, Doug & Sue Schwingel, George Buss, Evelyn Buss, Onlee Zeh, Matt Dusenbery, Mike & Lois Gordon, Tim & Ann Smith, Roger Wolcott, Paul Wolcott and numerous others who have asked not to have their names printed due to the harassment and retaliation from the Cohocton Wind Watch opposition group.
We are constantly receiving emails, letters, phone calls, etc of support for our efforts and encouragement to pursue this great project of Wind Power for Cohocton.


Many of our group are life-long residents of Cohocton, many are people who have moved into the area and have become community minded members of Cohocton, not just people who occasionally buy gas or groceries from our merchants, but people who roll up their sleeves and volunteer their time and efforts to make our community better.
These people would never consider suing their neighbors or not speaking to friends over a difference of opinion, nor would they disrespect the elected and appointed officials of our community.


We hope as you are reviewing the Wind Turbine Project for Cohocton, you will be considerate of our public officials and respect them for the hard work and endless concern they have for our community.

Jim Lince(formosa),

As your site does not allow comment unless one is a registered user of the site, I have asked the YES! Wind Power for Cohocton group to copy your posting about Mick Sagrillo hear so that I may comment on it.

Mick Sagrillo is in fact a regular on the American Wind Energy Association’s (AWEA). I will go back and look at the recording of the town board meeting but I believe I stated this fact then. If I did not, I did post Mick’s letter in the front window of the Cohocton Wind Office with a bio of his wind energy work for all to see.

When I went looking for information on the Lincoln Wisconsin wind project and subsequent committee on a moratorium, I found Mick’s letter. I also did not stop there. I further looked into Mick Sagrillo and found the same things you now post on your site.

My first reaction was “Great, a person in the wind energy industry who sent out information against wind development and now has flip flopped”. But I did not stop there. I actually called and spoke with Mick. I learned that his expertise in is small residential type turbines. I learned that he sits on panels for the State of Wisconsin. And I learned that he was not alone in creating the Lincoln Wisconsin report, he was chairman, there was a member who was a land lease holder, a member who was not a lease holder but pro-wind, a member who was neutral, and a member who Mick described as “DEEPLY” opposed.

I also learned that there is another wind project close to the one spoke of in the report. Mick told me on the phone that one thing they learned in researching for the report was that people were more upset with the developer than they were with the projects themselves. People around the Madison Gas and Electric project generally had less complaints or issues than those around the Wisconsin Public Service project, even though the Madison Electric and Gas project has 3 more turbines than the Public Service project.

All of this information is available at the Cohocton Wind Office for anyone who is interested.



Tuesday, July 04, 2006
Mick Sagrillo: AWEA regular!
As Published in American Wind Energy Association's website. The very same Mick Sagrillo, who was the Chairman of the Lincoln moratorium, the very same Mick Sagrillo who wrote a passionate letter to AWEA as the "chairman" discrediting the Lincoln report. The very same Mick Sagrillo, UPC's Rick Towner stood up and used as evidence that Lincoln was misleading. The very same Mick Sagrillo has actively written about wind turbines on the AWEA website. He has his own page! http://www.awea.org/faq/sagrillo/We know it's the same Mick, because as chairman he wrote a letter in the Lincoln report using his "Power and Light" letterhead. So here's a "prowind" guy telling us the complaints at Lincoln were misleading - no wonder!!!! Funny how he doesn't state any of this in his letter to the AWEA as Chairman of Lincoln moratorium?One can only imagine who introduced the concept of industrial wind to Lincoln? The more you dig the more dirt you find.ADVICE FROM AN EXPERTby Mick SagrilloRESIDENTIAL WIND TURBINES AND NOISE--Mick Sagrillo, Sagrillo Power & LightAre residential wind systems too noisy?When a prospective wind generator owner seeks approval for a building permit for his or her project from a local zoning committee, the permit is occasionally held up by someone with concerns about the noise that the wind system may produce. Many times, the installation in question is the first that the zoning committee has dealt with, and there is likely not another residential wind system of similar make nearby to serve as a basis from which the zoning committee can make firsthand observations.[Note: Mick's articles on noise db's doesn't include distance, so the measurements are meaningless. Vacuum cleaner - 70db @ what distance? Sound levels need two variables SPL (sound pressure level) and distance. And yes I did take a class on acoustic engineering - formosa](rest can be found on the AWEA's website)
posted by formosa at 10:03 PM


Rick Towner
Public Outreach
Coordinator

UPC Wind Management, LLC
28 Maple Avenue
Cohocton, NY 14806
Tel: 585.384.9505
Fax: 585.384.5023
Mobile: 585.944.4684
Email: rtowner@upcwind.com
www.upcwind.com

Saturday, July 01, 2006

MORE INTIMIDATION AND THREATS FROM CWW

One has to wonder why a group who feels they have all the answers has to threaten to sue everyone in site and use unsavory language to get their point across. Their total disrespect for anyone with a different opinion is becoming very tiring.

As we have promised we are publishing pro and con for you to review. We have confidence that by becoming informed you will be able to offer constructive dialogue that will enable our town and its elected officials to make the best decisions for all concerned. Please show respect for these hard working individuals.

When people are shouting it becomes very hard to listen. Threats of lawsuits will do nothing to better our town or bring the community closer together.

Please read the article printed in the Evening Tribune, Hornell, N. Y.

http://www.eveningtribune.com/articles/2006/06/30/news/news03.txt